Rose Law Firm Blog

The Supreme Court's Connelly Decision: A Game-Changer for Business Owners with Corporate-Owned Life Insurance (COLI)

Written by Adam Rose | Jul 10, 2024 2:56:28 AM

On June 6, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case of Connelly, As Executor of the Estate of Connelly v. United States, significantly impacting the treatment of life insurance proceeds for federal estate tax purposes. This ruling has profound implications for business owners, particularly those who use Corporate-Owned Life Insurance (COLI) to fund buy-sell agreements. Here’s a deeper look at the case and why immediate action is necessary.

Case Overview

Two Brothers, Michael and Thomas Connelly, were the sole shareholders of Crown C Supply, a small building supply corporation. To ensure the business stayed within the family upon the death of either brother, they entered into a buy-sell agreement, in the form of stock-redemption agreement. This agreement stipulated that the surviving brother had the option to purchase the deceased brother's shares. If the surviving brother declined, the corporation was obligated to redeem the shares using life insurance proceeds.

When Michael Connelly passed away, Thomas declined to purchase the Shares activating Crown C Supply's obligation to redeem them using $3 million in life insurance proceeds. 

Thomas, as executor of his deceased brother’s estate, reported the value of Michael’s shares at the $3 million redemption price on the federal tax return. The IRS audited the estate tax return; and during the audit, the estate obtained a third-party appraisal that valued the shares at $3 million. However, the IRS disagreed and took the view that the corporation’s redemption obligation was not a liability that reduced the value of the shares. Hence the IRS valued the shares at $5.3 million, arguing that the life insurance proceeds should be included in the corporation's valuation, resulting in an additional estate tax liability of $889,914.

Both the District Court and the Eighth Circuit upheld the IRS's valuation, 

and the Supreme Court affirmed this decision. The Supreme Court held that “a corporation’s contractual obligation to redeem shares is not necessarily a liability that reduces a corporation’s value for purposes of the federal estate tax.” This means that when a company holds the obligation to redeem an owner’s interest upon death, the value of the life insurance proceeds must be included in the value of the business at the time of death. The Court reasoned that the shareholder’s economic interest is not impacted by a redemption.

This case is crucial as it has set a new precedent for the treatment of life insurance proceeds in estate valuations.

Why This Decision Is Critical

The Supreme Court's ruling fundamentally changes how life insurance proceeds are treated for estate tax purposes. Here are the key reasons why business owners with Corporate-owned Life Insurance (“COLI”) need to address this issue immediately:

  1. Increased Estate Tax Liability: The inclusion of life insurance proceeds in the business valuation significantly increases the estate's taxable value, potentially leading to substantial, unanticipated estate tax liabilities. This ruling impacts the estate’s liquidity , and necessitates the sale of business assets or even the business itself to satisfy tax obligations.
  2. Impact on Buy-Sell Agreements: Many buy-sell agreements are funded through life insurance policies in the form of redemption arrangements. These agreements were designed to provide liquidity for the purchase of shares upon the death of an owner without burdening the surviving owners or the business with significant tax liabilities. The new ruling means these agreements may no longer achieve their intended tax efficiencies, potentially causing financial strain on estates and businesses.
  3. Reevaluation of Estate Planning Strategies: Business owners must reassess their current estate planning strategies to ensure they remain effective under the new legal framework. This involves revisiting not only buy-sell agreements and shareholder life insurance provisions but also overall estate plans to account for the new treatment of life insurance proceeds. Specifically Closely held corporations must re-evaluate their life insurance and redemption obligations to make sure ownership remains within the family upon the death of a shareholder, and to avoid additional federal estate tax.
  4. Risk of Non-Compliance: Failure to adjust estate planning strategies in light of this ruling could result in non-compliance with IRS regulations, leading to penalties and additional financial burdens. Businesses must ensure that their planning and documentation are up to date and accurately reflect the current legal environment.

Detailed Steps for Business Owners

Given the significant implications of this decision, it is crucial for business owners with COLI to take the following detailed steps:

  1. Review Buy-Sell Agreements: Reevaluate your existing buy-sell agreements to understand their tax implications. Clearly define the method of determining the value of the Company and the shares to be redeemed and set forth the business purposes for the agreement. Determine if restructuring is necessary to ensure that these agreements still provide the intended financial security and tax efficiency. Pay close attention to the funding mechanisms and consider whether a cross-purchase agreement might be more beneficial.
  2. Consult with Legal and Tax Experts: Work with estate planning attorneys and tax advisors to review and update your estate planning documents and strategies. Ensure they align with current laws and court rulings. Experts can provide tailored advice on how to structure agreements and policies to minimize tax liabilities and comply with the new legal standards.
  3. Evaluate Life Insurance Policies: Assess the impact of your life insurance policies on your estate's valuation. Consider alternative structures, such as cross-purchase agreements, to avoid inflating estate tax values. This might involve purchasing life insurance policies in a way that they are owned by the individual shareholders or their trusts rather than the corporation. Even though these arrangements still increase the individual cost to owners, they can help avoid additional tax that would be imposed as a result of the Court’s decision.
  4. Seek Professional Valuations: Obtain regular, professional fair market valuations of your business to understand potential tax impacts and ensure compliance with market values and tax regulations. This can include the use of a third-party valuator or generally accepted methodology for determining the fair market value of a closely-held business. Accurate valuations are crucial in demonstrating to the IRS the true value of the business, excluding life insurance proceeds.
  5. Plan for Future Tax Obligations: Develop financial strategies to cover potential tax liabilities arising from share redemptions or corporate obligations. This could involve setting aside reserves, creating sinking funds, or planning for loans that might be needed to cover tax payments without disrupting business operations.
  6. Document Thoroughly: Maintain comprehensive records of all agreements, valuations, and transactions. Detailed documentation will be vital in supporting your estate's position during IRS reviews and audits. This includes keeping detailed records of how life insurance proceeds are handled and reported.

How We Can Help

At Rose Law Firm, we handle estate planning, corporate law, and tax law, making us uniquely positioned to help you navigate the complexities introduced by the Connelly decision. Our team provides comprehensive evaluations, strategic planning, and expert guidance to ensure your business and estate planning goals are protected.

  • Comprehensive Evaluations: We conduct thorough reviews of existing buy-sell agreements and life insurance policies to assess the impact of the Connelly decision on your estate plans.
  • Strategic Planning: Our team develops customized strategies to mitigate adverse tax implications, ensuring your estate planning objectives are met efficiently and effectively.
  • Expert Guidance: We provide ongoing legal advice to adjust and restructure buy-sell agreements and related documents, aligning them with current tax laws and court rulings.
  • Collaboration with Financial Advisors: We work closely with life insurance salespeople and wealth management companies to ensure that their clients' plans remain robust and effective in light of the new legal landscape.
  •  

Contact Us

If you are concerned about how the Connelly decision may affect your business or estate planning, we encourage you to contact us. Our experienced attorneys, Charlie Ford, and Adam Rose are ready to assist you in evaluating your current arrangements and developing solutions to address any potential issues.